There is no finalization... he is only legal in one class.... I/MGT according to the new rules...
I hope they gave the initial record in I/MGT class to the current I/GT record holder and gave the I/GT record back to the Midget. I guess we will know when we get the record books. 
Here's what they've posted for records:
Unblown Grand Touring Sports - /GT
B Duffin Brothers Ro. Duffin 9 /11 236.937
C Jan Berry Motorsports Ru. Duffin 8 /08 230.545
D SS & PF Racing C. Filler 9 /18 235.272
E P.O.P. Motorsports G. W. Phillips 8 /06 190.156
F RGS Motorsports R. Sirna 8 /16 190.759
G Team Siegel L. Siegel 8 /11 165.296
H Grey Beard Racing P. Swanson 8 /03 145.760
And it stops at "H".
The new records for the new category read as follows:
Modified Grand Touring Sports - /MGT
AA The Moore Boys B. Moore 8 /04 268.298
A The Moore Boys B. Moore 8 /06 253.632
I Saab Story T. Donney 9 /18 127.660
J Saab Story T. Donney 9 /17 123.765
So both of Tom's records migrated, but he is running an engine swap. I've talked with him, and he's cool with it.
But under this logic, I'm not sure why the Midget was pulled - I don't think a short stroke A Series constitutes and "engine swap", especially when the block itself was the one that came with the car when I purchased it.
Does production not permit the swapping of crankshafts?
I could argue that the Midget was about the closest to a "stock" specification on any car in GT.
So do I become the whiny guy from Wisconsin bitchin' about a lost record?
On December 17, Dan said:
Chris,
Records will follow the car. A car that is a current GT record holder but now does not qualify due to an engine swap will become the new *IGT record holder.
DW
* By "IGT", Dan was referring to what has now become "MGT" - the class name hadn't been determined at that point.
My response was this:
So Dan - how does the rule committee propose to investigate who ran what motor in any given year a record was set?
Think about this -
Tom Donney took the I-GT record at WOS this year. He did it with a swapped engine.
I had the record before with a destroked stock engine.
What you're proposing would imply that Tom would now have the record in a class he didn't run in or build for, lose a record he legally won, and I would get my record back?
Is there a precedent for this?
Dan, I really think this sounds like a worm can.
Dan got back to me the next day:
Chris,
The class you refer to didn't exist at the time the WoS was run, still doesn't. It is a simple matter of calling upon the collective memory of the LSR community to determine the status of the current GT record holders.
We are here to help you, trust us.
DW
So I guess I need to become that Whiny guy from Wisconsin bitchin' about a lost record . . .
Which is not what any of us wanted . . .